Mezhepler Tarihi: Muhammed Ebu Zehra. 1 like. Book. Mezhepler Tarihi. Prof. Dr. Muhammed Ebu Zehra. Mezhepler Tarihi – Prof. Dr. Muhammed Ebu Zehra. Category: Religious. Description. MUHAMMED EBU ZEHRA, ÝSLÂMDA SIYASÎ VE ÝTIKADÎ MEZHEPLER TARIHI (A HISTORY OF POLITICAL AND THEOLOGICAL SCHOOLS IN ISLAM)
|Published (Last):||23 July 2011|
|PDF File Size:||1.51 Mb|
|ePub File Size:||2.47 Mb|
|Price:||Free* [*Free Regsitration Required]|
Abu Zahra says that in the letters of the institution Ihvanussafa these are related about this issue: Wherever is human there is disagreement, because this is part of the characteristics of human. The fact that the issues that are open to disagreement are actually unclear: The one who grabs its ear says that it is a flat and thin creature that can be folded up.
Muhammed Ebu Zehra (Author of Son Peygamber Hazreti Muhammed)
Most often, the disagreements arise not because the issues are unclear or hard to comprehend, but because each side of the disagreement does not know the view of the other. As their understanding and capacities differ, their views and beliefs differ likewise. In addition, there are the ones who are stupid, whose hearts are blind and confused.
In order to make a comment, please login or register. So everyone takes the statements of the one he imitates as the truth; thus, the disagreements in history continue without changing. Some blind reach the place of an elephant. Besides the factor of creation, the other factors having effect in this matter are shortly as follow: This is one of the reasons why the learned differed in their views and sects.
What are the reasons of the difference in views about Islamic issues?
As is seen, each of them understood just one part of the truth, declared their friends wrong, and claimed that they are mistaken in the understanding of the truth.
And these groups have principles and measures of their own.
Mezhepelr example, there are differences in the way the scholars of fiqh Islamic Jurisprudence and theology view the Quran. Disagreements arise because everyone has different desires, interests, and dispositions. Every person penetrates into an aspect of the truth. For this reason, the matter will be better understood if all the verses about the issue are looked into.
The example of Plato clarifies this issue very well: For this reason, Socrates says, If the thing upon which disagreement exits is known, mezheplet disagreement stops.
So, Man wills and God creates. Each one grabs an organ of the elephant and tries to imagine what it is. So, even if they are wrong, he insists on his views. The difference in the capacity of understanding and insight: This being the case, people growing up in different environments will show differences. Otherwise, it may be thought that everyone says the truth at the first glance; but in reality the conclusion they reach is defective and lacking.
What are the reasons of the difference in views about Islamic issues? | Questions on Islam
People cannot be far from the truth, as well as they cannot express it to the full. Skip to main content.
There are lots of people whose capacity of understanding is high, evaluation precise, and reflection keen. Therefore; while there are verses supporting the Mutazile who says that people create their own deeds and that God has no intervention in the deeds of His slaves; there are also verses supporting the Cebriyye who says that people have no will and that they are like leaves in the wind against the will of God.
What are the reasons of the difference in views about Islamic issues? For example, while it is mentioned in the Koran about the free will of the human, it is also stated that all kinds of will and power are peculiar to God.
There are very different groups of jobs. The one who grabs one of its legs zerha that this is a long and round animal similar to a trunk of a tree. Log in Create new account Random Question. Thus the issue which is seen as two sided tariyi understood and it is seen that they do not contradict one another.
I want to ask a mezhep,er. And in the end, their conclusions will be different in the same issues. So, each group of job will proceed in accordance with their principles. If looked into as a whole, not separately, the truth will be better understood.
One of the reasons of the disagreement is the imitation of the old; because imitation causes blind and faulty conviction.
The one who reaches to its back says that this is a creature like high hills. In the mwzhepler man wills he cannot escape responsibility.
Wherever there is blind conviction, it is just natural that excessive disagreements exist, because the mentality of imitation kills the objective reasoning and causes the minds to become dim.